West Virginia Retaliation Law: What Counts & the Presumption Window (2026)

What counts as retaliation, and the window where the law presumes it

At a glance

Who this covers — and who it does not

This page covers landlord retaliation in West Virginia — what a landlord may not do after you exercise a protected right.

It does not cover commercial leases, or conduct outside the protected window described below.

What the law prohibits

西弗吉尼亚**普通住宅无报复成文法**:55-3A-3(g) 只是上诉抗辩条款;实质报复保护靠判例 Imperial Colliery v. Fout (1988)。

55-3A-3(g) 原文仅「absent an issue of ... retaliatory eviction」——上诉时若涉报复不得恢复占有,非实质报复条款。真正报复抗辩来自判例 Imperial Colliery Co. v. Fout (1988) 与 Criss v. Salvation Army Residences (1984)。**无推定窗口**。唯一成文报复法是 mobile home park 的 37-15-7。tenantrightsinfo 明确「NONE for ordinary residential tenants」。

None (no general state anti-retaliation statute); Imperial Colliery Co. v. Fout, 179 W. Va. 776 (1988); W. Va. Code § 37-15-7 (mobile home only) ↗

The protection window

West Virginia does not set a statutory presumption window. Whether an action counts as retaliation depends on the facts rather than a fixed clock.

无固定推定窗口(判例 Fout 无时间推定;37-15-7 亦无)。

None (no statutory presumption window) ↗

Protected activities

无州级受保护行为清单(普通住宅无报复成文法)。判例 Fout 承认向政府投诉房屋法规等行使权利后的报复抗辩。

Imperial Colliery Co. v. Fout (1988) ↗

What a landlord may not do

无州级禁止行为清单(普通住宅无报复成文法);mobile home park 租客依 37-15-7 禁止选择性涨租/减服务/驱逐。

W. Va. Code § 37-15-7 (mobile home only) ↗

Burden of proof

无推定窗口,举证责任在主张报复的租客(判例 Fout)。

Imperial Colliery Co. v. Fout (1988) ↗

Remedies

普通住宅:报复是驱逐诉讼的抗辩(Fout);上诉时 55-3A-3(g) 保留恢复占有。mobile home 租客依 37-15-6a 追偿(实际损害 + treble 或 1 年租金孰高 + 律师费)。

W. Va. Code § 55-3A-3(g); 37-15-6a ↗

Sources and how to verify them

Every figure on this page comes from the official text or a state court opinion, not from a summary. The table below lists each provision used and the date it was last checked.

StatuteLast verifiedSource
None (no general state anti-retaliation statute); Imperial Colliery Co. v. Fout, 179 W. Va. 776 (1988); W. Va. Code § 37-15-7 (mobile home only) 2026-10-16 official text ↗
None (no statutory presumption window) 2026-10-16 official text ↗
Imperial Colliery Co. v. Fout (1988) 2026-10-16 official text ↗
W. Va. Code § 37-15-7 (mobile home only) 2026-10-16 official text ↗
W. Va. Code § 55-3A-3(g); 37-15-6a 2026-10-16 official text ↗

Where the official text and a secondary summary disagree, this page follows the official text and says so. Where a provision admits of more than one reading, that is flagged rather than smoothed over.

When you need a lawyer instead of a tool

A self-help guide is the right starting point for understanding your position. Get legal help if:

Local legal aid organisations and tenant unions offer free help for qualifying cases. They are independent of this site — we list them because they are the right place to go, not because they link here.

More West Virginia guides

West Virginia Security Deposit Return · West Virginia Security Deposit Rules · West Virginia Eviction Process · West Virginia Rent Increase Rules · West Virginia Repairs & Habitability

→ All West Virginia tenant rights topics

Common questions

What counts as landlord retaliation in West Virginia?

西弗吉尼亚**普通住宅无报复成文法**:55-3A-3(g) 只是上诉抗辩条款;实质报复保护靠判例 Imperial Colliery v. Fout (1988)。

How long is the retaliation presumption window in West Virginia?

The state does not set a statutory presumption window. 无固定推定窗口(判例 Fout 无时间推定;37-15-7 亦无)。